Two thirds of searches never leave Google
Up from 60% in 2024. The answer arrives on the results page and the visit ends there.
SEO for personal injury law firms
I run your firm’s entire search channel as one system, so you get found, trusted, and recommended wherever someone looks for a lawyer. Traditional search, local, and AI visibility, measured in signed cases.

Companies I’ve worked with
What changed
Two years ago about four in ten Google searches still ended in a click. Today it is closer to three. When Google answers with AI, the click roughly halves again. And what the AI says about your firm is mostly assembled from sites you do not own, which means the job is no longer getting ranked. It is being the answer everywhere someone thinks to ask.
Up from 60% in 2024. The answer arrives on the results page and the visit ends there.
When an AI summary appears, people click a result about half as often. They click a link inside the summary itself 1% of the time.
Across 21,000 brands, the evidence AI search engines retrieve sits mostly on third-party pages.
The Visibility Loop
Three stages that repeat. The data decides what gets worked on next, and the work goes live the week it is decided rather than waiting on somebody’s roadmap.
We audit and measure everything so we have data to compare.
Rebuild the site, then clean up your offsite presence.
Publish, measure, refine, so each month builds on the one before it.
Who You Work With
I studied business at UC Berkeley’s Haas School and have spent fifteen years building high-value websites and running the search programs behind them. A small team helps me execute, but you are not handed off to an account manager, and you are never re-explaining your firm to someone new.
The work is AI-leveraged end to end. Research, analysis, and production move at a pace a traditional team cannot staff for, which is why what gets decided this week is live this week instead of waiting behind somebody else’s roadmap. It should feel like having the capability in house, without hiring for it.
Selected work
David Ryan is first-class all the way. His expertise and attention to detail are superb. He exceeded above and beyond expectations and is what every agency should be.
Dan JimmersonCMO, national personal injury firmCustom build with intake and attribution wired through to signed cases, and structured data connecting the firm to its practice areas.
Site and content architecture for a regulated healthcare product with a long, technical buying cycle.
Subscription product site built for search, with the reporting to see what the channel was actually returning.
SEO Insights
Work With Us
I work with one personal injury firm per market and cap the roster at five. The engagement is built for firms that want organic search to become a larger growth channel and are comfortable with an AI-native operating model. A fit call takes fifteen minutes, and I will be clear about whether it makes sense to work together.
Frequently Asked Questions
For most personal injury firms, direct referrals from AI tools are still a small slice of traffic. The bigger issue is not referrals. It is that the click a firm used to earn is now being answered without it. When an AI summary appears, people click a result about half as often, and roughly two thirds of Google searches end without any click at all. So AI search is less a new source to chase than a signal that the old one is shrinking while the firm decides what to do about it.
For a law firm it is the same discipline over a wider surface. Rankings and the local map pack still matter and still get worked. What changes is that being named by an answer engine depends far more on what the rest of the internet says about the firm than on what is written on the firm’s own pages. Most of what AI repeats about a brand comes from third-party sources, which means a program that only touches the website cannot move it.
No, and anyone promising a law firm otherwise is selling something. There is no dashboard where a firm edits the answer. What a firm can control are the inputs: a consistent name, practice areas, locations and results everywhere they appear, citations from the sources these systems already trust, and structured information about who the firm is. From there you measure what the answers actually say over time and keep correcting the record.
Personal injury changes the work in three ways. A signed case is worth enough that a handful a year can pay for the whole program, so the target is qualified case types rather than raw traffic. Intake is phone-heavy, which means attribution has to survive a phone call and land in the CRM or nobody can tell which work produced the case. And every page is attorney advertising, so compliance review sits inside the publishing process rather than after it. Markets are also genuinely competitive, which is why the answer is depth in one firm’s markets rather than a template.
For a personal injury firm the first ninety days go to foundation: a full visibility audit, the site rebuild, attribution and call tracking wired up, and directory and citation cleanup. Local visibility and AI citations often move inside that window, because consistency and structure are what those systems react to fastest. Competitive case-type terms take longer, usually a few quarters. I do not promise case volume on a timeline, and a firm that gives you one is guessing.